Prehardened Mold
Steels offer Machinability and
Weldability By Stuart Caren,
contributing editor
For decades P-20 has been the
most widely used steel for making large
plastic injection molds. It offers a good
combination of hardness, machinability, and
toughness, but its properties are not always
consistent. Frequently, the hardness isn't
uniform thoughout a block, which leads to
machining problems, and it is difficult to
weld.
In the past few years, tool
steels that are easier to machine and weld
have been developed. One of these new
materials is a precipitation hardening steel
of uniform microstructure and hardness that
was developed by Prof. Asada and Dr. Watanabe
of Daido Industrial College in Nagoya, Japan.
This material was introduced to the plastics
industry in 1965 as NAK 80. Although NAK 80
is considerably harder than P-20 (40 Rockwell
C compared with 32 Rockwell C for P-20), it
reportedly machines 15-20% faster than P-20
and can be polished to a Class I
optic-quality finish.
To further improve
machinability, a small amount of sulfur was
added to NAK 80 to produce a new grade of
steel called NAK 55. Some NAK 55 users report
as much as a 50% reduction in machining time.
According to Dave Hunt, vice president of
engineering at Hunt Machine (Talmadge, OH),
NAK 55 is "the best machining prehardened
steel I've ever cut."
The success of NAK 80 and NAK 55
is only partially attributable to their
excellent machinability. Usually, a mistake
in the mold or part design must be corrected
by welding. It is very difficult to weld,
polish, and retexture the surface of P-20
without the welded area being visible in the
steel and in the molded part. If the mistake
occurs in a highly polished or textured area,
the entire cavity may need to be scrapped.
The mold made from NAK, when proper
procedures and NAK-W welding rods are used,
will have uniform hardness across the weld.
This allows the toolmaker to purposefully
match the polish or etch.
Roland Krevitt, tooling engineer
from Apple Computer (Santa Clara, CA),
explains it this way: "In today's business
environment, it is crucial that we shorten
the time to market for new products as much
as is humanly possible. Because of this
constant pressure, we are usually forced to
build molds while the parts are being
designed. This means we make a lot of changes
to our molds, both during the construction
and after the try-out. If NAK was not
available, we would be in trouble. Our
ability to make these changes, sometimes in
an already textured area, has saved us
countless times. We have also found that NAK
etches much better than other mold
steels."
Then combination of
machinability and weldability is the main
reason moldmakers select NAK over P-20 in
spite of it's higher cost. According to Tom
Schade, vice president and general
manager for International Mold Steels
(Erlanger, KY), the U.S. distributor for
Daido Steel Co. Ltd., NAK 55 and NAK 80 are
used for over 90% of all prehardened molds
build in Japan and are rapidly becoming the
materials of choice for moldmakers around the
world. This is confirmed by people like Dave
Hunt of Hunt Machine and Ed Noggle of
Southern Plastic Mold (Anaheim,
CA).
Since they were introduced to
the United States in 1982, NAK steels have
been used for thousands of molds. Companies
such as Apple Computer and General Motor's
Inland Fisher Guide Division (Dayton, OH)
often specify NAK because of anticipated
design changes. Design changes to new parts
typically require modification of the
tool.
Design changes are also often
made during the life of the part. An example
is a horn pad that Hunt Machine built for
General Motors. After the mold was completed,
designers decided to relocate the bugles. "If
we cut it in P-20, we would have had to throw
away the mold and start again" said Paul
Bryan, a tooling engineer at General
Motors.
At Mold Expo '93 in Detroit, MI.
last month, International Mold Steels
introduced another prehardened steel for
injection molds. Called PK5, it combines the
weldability and machinability of NAK with
added toughness (Table 1).
Table 1. Properties of
prehardened mold steels
|
Steel |
Tensile strength
(kgf/mm
2) |
Yield strength
(kgf/mm
2) |
Hardness* |
Toughness
†
(kgf-m/cm
2) |
| PX5 |
100 |
88 |
32 |
8 |
| NAK 80 |
128 |
103 |
40 |
2 |
| P-20 |
100 |
88 |
32 |
5 |
| AISI
4140 |
95 |
75 |
25 |
5 |
* Rockwell C †Charpy impact test
PX5 has the same hardness as
P-20 (32 Rockwell C), but the hardness is
more consistent through the entire thickness.
The steel's tensile and yield strengths are
similar to NAK and P-20. Although a quench
and temper heat-treating process is used in
manufacturing PX5, the steel is quite stable.
It can be machined to size without the need
to relieve stress on the block before the
finish cut. Figure 1 compares the
machinability of PX5 with that of several
common mold steels.
|
The sacrifice in
hardness from NAK (40 Rockwell
C) is made up for by higher
toughness. PX5 is 60% tougher
than P-20. This improved
toughness allows increased
design creativity and
flexibility.
What really
makes PX5 unique is its
weldability. Welding this
steel requires neither
preheating nor postheating
(Figure 2), which greatly
reduces welding time and, of
course, cost.
According to
Ernie Beutel, vice president
of technical services for
International Mold Steels,
the increase in hardness in
the area heated during
welding is very low and
distortion is minimal,
resulting in low overall
repair time and cost. As with
NAK steels, the weld can be
textured or polished with no
observable difference in the
surface.
Since PX5 was
introduced in Japan about two
years ago, hundreds of molds
have been built with this new
steel. Hunt Machine learned
about it several months ago
and has already built a mold
for General Motors. According
to Dave Hunt, PX5 has lived
up to its claims, and he
confirms that it is easy to
machine and weld.
|
FIGURE 1. PX5
machines about 30% faster than
P-20 in both end mill (top) and
drill (bottom)
comparisons. |
As with any new material, at
least one drawback must offset the benefits.
The only one we heard about is the cost. PX5
costs about twice as much as P-20. But
because the steel cost is only 5-10% of the
total mold cost, the savings in machining
time and superior weldability more than make
up the difference.
Copyright © 1993
Advanstar Inc. All rights
reserved.
|